Bennett Durando, the Nuggets’ beat writer, recently delved into the unfolding drama of the Lakers’ coaching search. Despite the available talent, the Lakers bypassed a notably strong candidate in David Adelman.
As I witnessed the Lakers miss out on UConn’s Dan Hurley last weekend, the spectacle felt more like a Hollywood drama than a professional sports process. Hurley’s candidacy surged suddenly, highlighted by a cross-country flight to Los Angeles, a reported six-year, $70 million contract offer, and public comments that hinted at his temptation to accept the role.
Yet, the saga concluded with his rejection, and extension talks now loom in Connecticut. This whirlwind left many, including myself, pondering: What about David Adelman?
The manner in which Hurley’s interest was projected—whether genuine or a strategic ploy—remains ambiguous. This episode leaves the Lakers’ search seemingly back at square one, with all remaining candidates keenly aware they’re not the first choice.
David Adelman, Denver’s lead assistant, is no stranger to such situations. Over the past few seasons, he’s been a sought-after candidate for head coaching vacancies, including recent interviews with the Charlotte Hornets, Cleveland Cavaliers, and, notably, the Lakers. Despite receiving rave reviews from players, Adelman has yet to secure a head coaching role.
Hiring Adelman wouldn’t bring the same flair as Hurley, the animated two-time NCAA champion, or the boldness of JJ Redick, an ESPN commentator and LeBron James’ podcast partner. Yet, Adelman’s credentials are substantial. As Denver’s highest-ranking assistant, he’s a key architect behind a team celebrated for its offensive strategies.
At 43, he’s both youthful and seasoned, fitting the popular mold of up-and-coming assistants ready for head coaching duties. His recent success with the Nuggets, leading them to victory in Michael Malone’s absence, underscores his capabilities. Nuggets players and coaches, including Aaron Gordon and Malone, have openly advocated for his readiness to lead an NBA team.
The Lakers, with their penchant for high-profile, flashy hires, might overlook someone like Adelman. Yet, his profile suggests he’s more than a backup option. Given the Lakers’ recent struggles and their tendency to cycle through coaches, hiring someone with Adelman’s pedigree could provide the stability and tactical acumen they desperately need.
Interestingly, the Nuggets have been preparing for Adelman’s departure, recognizing his potential. Figures from Malone’s coaching tree, like Micah Nori and Jordi Fernandez, have already moved on to head coaching roles, indicating Adelman’s turn is imminent.
Despite the Lakers’ glamorous reputation, the position comes with immense pressure and scrutiny. The team’s “win-now” mentality, coupled with managing the twilight years of LeBron James’ career, presents a formidable challenge. The Lakers have seen six head coaches since Phil Jackson, none lasting beyond 250 games, highlighting the high-risk nature of the role.
Yet, for Adelman, a head coaching job is an opportunity that might outweigh the associated risks. The Lakers offer a high-reward scenario, even if fraught with challenges. Moreover, poaching Adelman from the Nuggets—who have thwarted the Lakers’ playoff ambitions in consecutive seasons—could strategically weaken a key rival.
The Lakers’ coaching saga continues, marked by a significant public rejection and a search process that feels disjointed. Should Adelman remain with Denver this round, his departure in the next seems inevitable. The Lakers’ missed opportunity with Adelman might just be another chapter in their ongoing quest for stability and success.
